I think we need to first start with the definition of what is meat by static technology and dynamic technology. When we talk about static technology, we are addressing the the concept of NON-CHANGING. When we talk about dynamic technology, we are addressing the concept of CHANGE.
Lets start by addressing some issues in the static concept map. If we have content that is article or text form and it is printed into a text book and something changes about that particular topic--there is no way to truly update the printed material until the time comes for the article or text to be edited and reprinted. With the dynamic concept of content we could give our students a simulation activity, which I do each semester, that contains real life issues and problems and they would be able to walk away with a better understanding of the same topic that was being taught with static technology.
In my opinion there needs to be more dynamic technology but I don't think society is ready, nor do we need to "write-off" static technology. There should be a good medium ground that both forms of technology can meet.
Brandy,
ReplyDeleteGreat blog post. I appreciate the pros and cons analysis. I agree that society may not be ready for more dynamic (Interactive) technology advancements. In a previous technology class we discussed the psychology factor in technology and what society will adapt to. I think that your point deals with this.